The ranking system as used by the software is by posting number. I could always increase the number of posts required to attain ranks. Anything else would be just too complex to maintain and timeconsuming so the short answer is Nope!Andrew Hannah wrote:I think the idea of awarding ranks was good-at-the-time. It helped to get the new website off to a good start. But I think it is time to re-examine and modify the basis of promotion. I would suggest the following.
Instead of promoting on the basis of number of posts, we should perhaps consider a member's real worth to the class. Such as the number of championships attended, number of open meetings attended, whether on the association committee etc. It would, of course, adversely affect me. I would be cashiered to the lowest rank! No doubt, that would please Robert.
What do others think?
Hi RobertRobert wrote:I'll have to steer clear of Andrew until I get promoted, then
I worked it out and I suspect that EVEN the grubguru will......................Robert wrote:It's a state of mind thing. Martin did convert a recent picture of me down to size but I decided I looked too old so I picked out a likeness of my inner self. I used Microsoft Office Picture Manager to resize and compress it. Not sure if Frank's digits would be delicate enough for the task...
